Your lawyers should validate findings.
Not search for them.
You send your playbook and 20–30 vendor contracts. We hand back findings 15–20 business days later — clause, citation, severity, recommended action, owner. An hour of judgment calls instead of forty hours of reading.
We do the work. Your team validates and decides.
Five artifacts. One hour to validate.
Not another tool to log into.
You receive a folder: findings register, executive memo, evidence pack, methodology note, and a founder-led readout call — plus optional redline drafts. Your lawyers spend an hour confirming judgment calls, not forty hours of reading contracts to find them.
Findings register
Every finding, one row. Severity, recommended action, owner field, clause reference, and the verbatim evidence quote pinned to its location in the original PDF. The file your legal ops team works through in one sitting.
- —Severity · evidence · location · action
- —Owner field per finding · filterable
- —Citations audit-defensible · pinned to source PDF
Executive memo
Two to five pages of business language for the people who decide but don't read contracts — GC, CFO, Head of Compliance. Top risks, prioritized, sign-blocking vs negotiable.
- —Plain language · no legalese
- —Top 5–10 risks · prioritized
- —Sign-blocking vs negotiable split
Evidence pack
Every material finding tied back to source contract language — the verbatim quote, the section reference, and the rule it maps to. The file your lawyers and auditors open when they want to check our work.
- —Verbatim quotes · section references
- —Each finding traceable to source
- —Audit-defensible · no paraphrasing
Methodology note
A concise, client-facing note: what was reviewed, what rules were applied, how findings were generated, and how your team should validate them. The document that makes the review defensible to an auditor.
- —What was reviewed · what rules applied
- —How findings were generated
- —How to validate · audit-defensible
Readout call
Forty-five minutes with the engineer who ran the sprint. We walk findings, agree priorities, plan next steps. No PowerPoint, no junior associate handoff.
- —Founder-led · no handoff
- —Priority decisions · next steps
- —Recording + notes delivered
Redline drafts (optional)
Available where you supply fallback language or enough guidance to support suggested wording: Word documents per contract with native track changes aligned to your playbook. Your lawyers stay in control of every word.
- —Optional add-on · needs your fallback language
- —Word .docx · native track changes
- —Aligned to your playbook · clause-by-clause
Ten years of production AI.
Before OpsSolved, the same engineer shipped AI/ML into regulated production for a decade — financial services, telecoms, public sector. The contract-review pipeline is benchmarked in the open against the CLAUSE legal dataset, weak categories included.
A generation system in daily production use by 2,000+ people.
A document-generation system shipped into a large regulated organisation and adopted across the business — the kind of production reliability and review discipline the contract-review pipeline is built on.
An automated review workflow taken from 83% to 96% accuracy.
A production checklist/review system measured, calibrated, and improved against a defined accuracy target — the same measure-then-calibrate method applied to your playbook in a sprint.
Contract-review recall published in the open, per type.
Recall by contradiction type on the public CLAUSE legal benchmark — including the categories where the pipeline is weakest. Reproducible and audit-defensible, not a single marketing number.
€12–15K per sprint.
€8–10K as a design partner.
The price gap exists because we engineer the repetitive verification — 80% of vendor contract review — not because we cut corners on quality. Methodology, evidence, audit trail all preserved. Your lawyers stay in control.
- DESIGN PARTNER€8–10K fixedProvide a reference, structured feedback, or a case study and the sprint runs at the design-partner rate. Standard pricing applies otherwise.
- GUARANTEERedo or refundIf more than 30% of findings are factually incorrect — not judgment disagreement, actual errors — we redo or refund. You keep all deliverables either way.
- SECURITYPre-cleared, documentedGDPR processor DPA, EU data residency (Azure Frankfurt), encrypted upload, 30-day deletion, audit log. ISO 27001 audit scheduled Q1 2027.
- PROCUREMENTFixed-scope SOWNo platform license. No auto-renewal. No ongoing fees. Standard payment terms (50/50). Usually fits under discretionary spend authority.
If your review workflow doesn't need what we build, we'll tell you.
We'd rather walk away than force the wrong workflow into the wrong system. If a lightweight add-in is enough, we'll say so. If there's no stable playbook, no repeatable contract family, or no real benchmark path — we'll say that too.
The scoping call exists to figure out whether your review workflow is a real fit for a fixed-scope sprint — not to sell you software you don't need.
Scope your Vendor
Contract Review Sprint.
Bring one contract family, one playbook (or your current review checklist), and the rough contract volume. In 20 minutes, we'll tell you whether it's a fit and what a sprint would look like.
OpsSolved does not provide legal advice or regulatory representation. We deliver evidence-backed findings and review artifacts; your legal and compliance teams validate findings and make final decisions.